DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
MUSLIMS AND QADIYANI
(Highlighting
the Difference between qadiyani and Other Unbelievers)
By
Maulana Muhammad Yusuf
Ludhianvi
Compiled by:
Maulana Manzoor Ahmad
Al-Hussaini
CONTENTS
·
Foreword by the
Translator
·
The Question in Three Parts
·
The Answer
·
Categories of Kafirs
·
Who is an Apostate
·
Concession of Shari’at
for Apostate
·
Apostasy is a deadly
disease of Millat: Why?
·
Order of Shari’at for
Dualist-Infidel: Zindiq
·
Views of Imam Malik
·
Difference between
Apostate and Dualist-Infidel
·
Qadiyani’ Covenant of
‘Kufr’
·
Why qadiyani are
Dualist-Infidels (Zindiq)
·
Meaning of Final
Prophethood
·
Meaning of ‘Last of
Children’ and ‘Last of Prophets’
·
Qadiyani have altered
the meaning of
·
‘Khatam un Nabieen’
·
Look at the ‘Bahai’
religion
·
Three Questions to
qadiyani
·
Qadiyani Kalimah
·
Do people know that
·
Crimes of mirza ghulam
ahmed of qadiyan
·
Confessional treatment
of qadiyanies by Muslims
·
How can the qadiyanies
·
Disgrace
·
Commands of Shari’at
for Descendants of
·
Apostates (‘Murtadeen’)
·
Commands of Shari’at
for Descendants of Dualist-Infidels (‘Zindiq’)
·
Ten legitimate sons and
one non-descript
·
Raving Claim
·
Dialogue with a
qadiyani
·
Challenge to
Muslims
·
Liar in mother’s lap
·
Traitors
·
Bondsmen of Prophet
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
in
FOREWORD
By
the Translator
This publication will vindicate the
enormity of the qadiyani mischief. I appeal to you to read it carefully and
dispassionately and then decide for yourself what you can do to curb the
perfidy of qadiyaniat.
I appeal to every Muslim, who desires
Allah’s Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) to
intercede for him on the Judgement Day, to cooperate with Aalami Majlise
Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat in raising aloft the banner of Khatme Nubuwwat.
I beseech every Muslim to display his
sense of honour against the qadiyanies.
I invite every Muslim to rise and offer
whatever sacrifice he can for this cause.
K. M. Salim
GENTLEMEN!
I want to tell you briefly how
qadiyanies differ from other ‘Kafirs’. But before I do so, I shall answer a
question which is in the minds of some of our brothers.
THE
QUESTION (in three parts):
Firstly:
Why is it that an organization called Aalami Majlise Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat
has been set up, specifically aiming to pursue qadiyanies to whichever part of
the world they go and expose them by Allah’s help and with the cooperation of
Muslim brethren when there are other non-Muslims also in the world, such as
Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc?
Secondly:
Why is there no such organization against any other ‘Kafir’ community?
Thirdly:
What was the reason for such stalwarts of Islam as Imam-ul’asr Muhammad Anwar
Shah Kashmiri, Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Binnori, Ameer-e-Shariat
Ataullah Shah Bukhari, and Hazrate Aqdas Maulana Mufti Mahmood, (Allah’s mercy
on all of them), to have attached so much importance to counter the ‘Kufr’ of
qadiyanies that it was considered necessary to establish an organization, on an
international level, namely Aalami Majlis-e-Tahaffuz-e-Khatme Nubuwwat?
ANSWER:
Before I answer, I sum up the question
which in short is: What distinguishes a qadiyani from other Non-Muslims?
First
I lay before you an example:
You know that wine is prohibited in
Shari’at. Drinking wine, manufacturing and selling it are all prohibited, i.e.,
‘Haram.’ Similarly, you know that a pig is filthy and impure. Selling its meat
which is called pork and its eating, giving or conveying are absolute
prohibitions, i.e., ‘Harame Mutlaq.’ Everyone is aware of these precepts.
Now imagine a situation: A man sells
wine and calls it wine. Another man also sells wine but pastes a label of
‘Zam-Zam’ on the bottle, i.e., he is selling wine under the name of ‘Zam-Zam’.
Both persons are criminals but who is a greater criminal? You know the answer.
Take another example: There is a
butcher who is selling pork. He sells it as such. Clearly he says this is pork.
Whosoever wants to buy may buy it. Certainly he is a criminal in Shari’at for
selling pork. Against this is a person who sells pork but calls it mutton. Now
both these persons have committed a crime in Islamic Law; but sky-high is the
difference in the nature of the offence between the two. One sells ‘Unlawful,’
i.e., ‘Haram’ calling it ‘Unlawful,’ Haram. The other sells ‘Unlawful’ Haram,
calling it ‘Lawful’, i.e. ‘Halal.’ Anybody, unawares, could fall into his trap
and eat ‘Unlawful-Haram’ pork thinking it to be ‘Lawful-Halal’ mutton.
Thus the difference between a butcher
selling pork as mutton and a butcher selling pork as pork is precisely the
difference between a qadiyani and other Non-Muslim such as Jew, Christian and
Hindu, etc. ‘Kufr’ is ‘Kufr’ in both cases because it is negation of Islam. But
‘Kafirs’ of the world do not put label of Islam on their ‘Kufr’ and do not
propagate their ‘Kufr’ as Islam. A qadiyani, on the other hand, puts a label of
Islam on his ‘Kufr’ and deceives Muslims by saying this is Islam.
CATEGORIES
OF ‘KAFIRS’
So far I have spoken to you in general
terms. I shall explain the theology.
‘Kufr’ is of several kinds but three
are very obvious:
First:
The ‘Kafir’ who is undoubtedly a ‘Kafir.’
Second:
That ‘Kafir’ who is ‘Kafir’ from inside but pretends as Muslim from outside.
Third:
That ‘Kafir’ who tries to label his ‘Kufr’ as Islam.
Category
No. 1:
Jews, Christians, Hindus, etc., are
unmistakably and undoubtedly ‘Kafirs.’ The Polytheists (Mushrikeen) of
pre-Islamic Makkah were also included in this category. All of them are openly
Kafirs.
Category
No. 2:
In the second, category are
‘Hypocrites’ (Munafiqeen) who recite with
the tongue but hide ‘Kufr’ in their hearts. In their case, Allah, the Exalted,
proclaims:
(arabi-112)
“When
Hypocrites come to you they say, “We believe in you as Allah’s Prophet.”
(arabi-112)
“And
Allah knows that you are certainly Allah’s Prophet.”
(arabi-112)
“And
Allah testifies that Hypocrites are perfect liars.”
Thus the ‘Kufr’ of ‘Hypocrites’
(Munafiqeen) is greater than that of normal ‘Kafirs’ because by reciting
Kalimah Tayyiba (arabi-112) they add lies to ‘Kufr.’
Hazrat Imam Shafai, (Allah’s mercy on
him), used to say about Ibrahim bin Ulayya: “I am his opponent, so much so,
that I shall oppose him even if he recites
(arabi-112).
It means that some persons are so
compulsive liars that they lie even in ‘Kalimah Tayyiba’ because their
‘Kalimah’ is a show of falsehood.
Category No. 3:
The “Kufr” of the third category
exceeds the ‘Kufr’ of the second category because their offence is that they
call their ‘Kufr’ as Islam. They present pure ‘Kufr’ in the nomenclature of
Islam by twisting the verses of the holy Quran, the sacred ‘Ahadith’ of the
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) the statements of his Companions and sayings
of revered saints in order to prove their ‘Kufr’ as Islam. Such men are called zindiq
(Dualist-infidels) in Shari’at terminology.
To sum up, the three categories are
Unbelievers; (Kafir); Hypocrites: (Munafiq); and Dualist-Infidel: (Zindiq).
‘Kafir’ (Unbeliever) is a person who
does not believe in Allah and the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) neither outwardly nor inwardly. ‘Munafiq’
(Hypocrite) is a person who hides ‘Kufr’ in his heart and his recitation of
‘Kalimah’ is false. He is a pretender. ‘Zindiq’ (Dualist-Infidel) is a person
who gilt-edges his ‘Kufr’ with the gold of Islam and tries to present it as
real Islam.
WHO
IS AN APOSTATE
An apostate (Murtad) is a person who
abandons Islam. A precept should be understood here which is recorded in the
books. All the four schools of ‘Fiqah’ unanimously agree that in case of an
apostate (Murtad), Shari’at allows him three days to enable him to remove his
doubts. All possible efforts should be made to clarify his doubts. If he
understands and re-enters Islamic fold, well and good; otherwise he should be
got rid of. This precept is known as ‘killing of apostate’ (Qatl-e-Murtad).
None of the Imams differs on this issue. Laws of all civilised countries and
governments award death punishment to rebels. As apostate is a rebel of Islam,
therefore apostasy (Irtidad) is punishable with death.
CONCESSION
OF SHARI’AT FOR APOSTATE
Islamic Shari’at offers a concession to
its rebels while laws of the world do not do so. They must put their traitors
to death even if they beg for mercy after their arrest and award of sentence.
Take the example of a rebel of any
modern government. He may repent, beg to be excused or vouch for good behaviour
a hundred times, assuring the government that in future he will never resort to
revolt; still he will not be heard. The capital sentence will be executed on
him. His repentance will be unacceptable. At no cost will he be excused.
But Islamic Shari’at Law gives a
concession to its rebel. The Apostate (Murtad) is allowed three days to think
over. He is advised to withdraw and renounce his apostatic stance. If he assures
for future and is repentant, he is not punished. In spite of this humane
concession afforded by Shari’at, Non-Muslims criticise the Islamic punishment.
It is a matter of surprise that there
are no objections to the hanging of a person when caught in conspiracy, say for
toppling the lawful Governments of the American President or the Russian
President or the Pakistani President. Conspirators are sentenced to death and
no law of any civlised court disagrees with this.
Why do then people disapprove of punishing
a person who rebels against Allah’s Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and
say: Do not put him to death! Islam does concede three days’ grace to enable
the apostate to remove his doubts and come back into the Islamic fold. If he
begs for mercy or repents, Shari’at grants him his life back. But if he is
adamant and refuses to renounce his apostasy then Allah’s sacred soil must be
cleaned of his foul existence.
APOSTASY
IS A DEADLY DISEASE
OF MILLAT: WHY?
It is so because it takes the form of a
carbuncle which stinks. If a malignant growth (Allah forbid) appears on some
part of human body, doctors advise its amputation. Who would call this a
tyranny over the patient? Rather a favour to him! By this removal the sound
parts of the body are saved from septic poisoning, else death would be certain.
Therefore it is wise to cut away the diseased part to protect he healthy part.
In the same way apostasy is a carbuncle
of Islamic Millat. The malignant part, i.e., the ‘Murtad,’ despite preaching
does not retrace his steps. Therefore, cancerous malignancy must necessarily be
removed otherwise his poison will gradually travel inside the entire physiology
of the Islamic Millat. This indeed is the unanimous verdict of the four Imams,
and theologians and doctors of Shari’at law. Wisdom and sagacity demands it.
The safety of Millat lies in it.
ORDER
OF SHARI’AT FOR
DUALIST-INFIDEL: ZINDIQ
A dualist-infidel is worse than an
apostate, because he is bent upon presenting his ‘Kufr’ as Islam. Imam Shafai
and Imam Ahmad, in their well-known sayings, were pleased to ordain that a
dualist-infidel (Zindiq) is governed by the same orders as an apostate
(Murtad); that is, afford him a chance first, give him time to repent and
permit him to return; to the Islamic fold. If within three days he does so,
leave him unscathed, otherwise it is obligatory to award him capital sentence.
VIEWS
OF IMAM MALIK:
Imam Malik, (Allah’s blessing on him),
goes one step forward to say (arabi-116)
“I will not accept the penitence of a
Dualist-infidel.”
By this he means to say that if a
person guises his ‘Kufr’ with Islam and does not repent, when caught in the
act, then, (leaving it to Allah whether or not He accepts his penitence), we
shall certainly promulgate Allah’s Shari’at on him, i.e., shall pronounce
capital punishment for him. This is a crime which is similar to adultery in
which a person may be penitent (Taaib) for future but his penitence will not
save him from death. Therefore, he will be punished under all circumstances.
Similarly, hands are to be amputated for stealing. A thief, on arrest, may
offer penitence (‘Tauba’) but his offence will not go unpunished. It is in this
light that Imam Malik says:
(arabi-117)
“I
will not accept the penitence of a Dualist- Infidel.” Capital punishment will
certainly be given to him, although he may be penitent (‘Taaib’) a hundred
times.
Similar sayings are on record from Imam
Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad bin Hambal, (Allah’s blessing on them.) In books of ‘Fiqah’
such as ‘Durr-e-Mukhtar’ and ‘Shami’ and some others, it is
written that if a Dualist-Infidel offers penitence (‘Tauba’) of his own free
will, his penitence will be accepted without capital penalty, provided no one
came to know of his offence. Similarly, he will be excused from punishment if
he became penitent of his own free will, on Allah’s guidance. Therefore, if a
qadiyani renounces his ‘qadiyanies’ on his own and offers penitence (‘Tauba’)
then he will be excused. On the contrary, if he offers penitence (‘Tauba’)
after arrest then there will be no excuse, irrespective of his repentance even
a hundred times.
DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN APOSTATE
AND DUALIST-INFIDEL:
Shari’at enjoins upon us to preach to
the apostate. If he as a result of preaching, undertakes penitence (‘Tauba’),
he will save himself from capital punishment but this does not apply to a
dualist-infidel. There is another saying from Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa,
and one from Imam Ahmad, (Allah’s blessings on them all), that penitence
(‘Tauba’) of a dualist-infidel is not acceptable because he has committed the
crime of dualist infidelity (Zindaqa), i.e., he applied false coating of Islam
over his ‘Kufr.’
I repeat, he has sold pork as mutton
and wine as ‘Zam-Zam.’ This is a crime which is not excusable and is certainly
punishable with capital sentence.
QADIYANIES’
COVENANT OF ‘KUFR’
My purpose here is not to tell you why
qadiyanies are ‘Kafirs.’ What I do wish to tell you is that in spite of their
being diehard ‘Kafirs’ they present their ‘Kufr’ with the label of ‘Islam’.
Take the case of our Kalimah Tayyiba (arabi-118)
They do not believe in our ‘Kalimah’.
How can they claim to be Muslims? Please understand this clearly that a person
who doubts in their being a ‘Kafir’ is not a Muslim. They pretend to be Muslims
and say, “We are Musalman, we are only a sect of Islam called Jamat-e-Ahmediya”
But they are liars. They have established their colony near
“I acknowledge Hazrat
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) as ‘Khatam un Nabieen’ with all
sincerity of my heart.”
By this covenant they deceive poor
simple Muslims.
WHY
QADIYANI ARE
DUALIST-INFIDELS (ZINDIQ)
They are so for the simple reason that
they pour Islam into their mould of ‘Kufr’ and label urine as ‘Zam-Zam’ and
dog’s carrion as ‘Halal’. The whole world knows that Allah’s Prophet Muhammad,
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was the last of the Prophets. This Islamic
doctrine of finality of prophethood is a definite certainty. On the occasion of
his farewell Haj, the Prophet declared:
(arabi-119)
“O
people! I am the last prophet and you are the last Ummat.”
Besides, there are more than two
hundred ‘Ahadith’ in which the Prophet, (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) himself
explained about the finality of Prophethood (‘Khatm e Nubuwwat’). In different
ways and through different expressions he was pleased to say that there will be
no prophet after him and that nobody will be given prophethood after him. . . .
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
MEANING
OF FINAL PROPHETHOOD
It does not mean that any previous
prophet is not alive. It simply means that if for the sake of argument all the
previous prophets supposedly come in the world in the times of our Prophet
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and
become his servants, even then our Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) shall
continue to be the last prophet since nobody has been awarded prophethood after
him. The list of the blessed prophets in the manifest of the All-Knowing Allah
carried his exhalted name in the last. With his arrival, the list of the holy
prophets became complete.
MEANING
OF ‘LAST OF CHILDREN
AND ‘LAST OF PROPHETS’
A child who is born last in a family is
called their youngest off-spring. He is the final child and none is born after
him. It does not mean that he is the last to survive among his brothers. Of
course, it sometimes happens that he is born last but dies earlier. Then the
father says: this child who died was my last one.
In the same way, the last prophet
(‘Khatam un Nabieen’) means no prophet after him; no person shall wear the
crown of prophethood or sit on the throne of prophethood after Muhammad
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). Those prophets who were sent down earlier are certainly
within our Faith but our Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is the last one. None else will wear
the prophetic mantle of honour after him; nor will the Ummat put faith in any
such pretender.
QADIYANI
HAVE ALTERED MEANING
OF ‘KHATAM UN NABIEEN’
Qadiyani say that the epithet of
‘Khatam un Nabieen’ does not mean that our Prophet is the last of the Prophets,
and that there shall be no prophet after him. In their opinion it means that
our Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) will certify future prophets with his seal, i.e., on
whomsoever he will stamp, that person shall become a prophet. What a nonsense!
In fourteen hundred years only one person, namely ghulam ahmed of Qadiyan has
been stamped as prophet and he too a cock-eyed man! The seal has authenticated
a one-eyed ‘Dajjal’ from Qadiyan!
I repeat that the term ‘Khatam un
Nabieen’ means that our Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is the
last prophet. All new entries have been stopped. They have been sealed. No
prophet will come after him. It is like an envelope which has been closed by
sealing it. ‘Khatam’ means sealing. Therefore, the term ‘Khatam un Nabieen’
means that the list of the prophets is completed and the seal has been placed
on it. Neither a fresh entry is possible nor will there be any removal from
that list.
But the qadiyani have changed the
meaning of ‘Khatam un Nabieen’ to mean that our Prophet grants certificates of
prophethood to persons. In other words, Allah, who was previously sending down
prophets, has now transferred this department to Prophet Muhammad.( Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) for stamping people and making them prophets!!
This is called infidelity (‘Zindaqa’).
In this way, they pronounce the name of Islam for meeting their nefarious
designs and twist the meaning of verses of the holy Quran to suit their
agnostic beliefs. That is why I say they sell pork and dog’s carrion as ‘Halal’
meat and produce liquor under the holy label of ‘Zam-Zam.’
By Allah, I would not have cared one
bit for them if they had plainly said: “We are not Muslims and Islam is not our
religion.”
LOOK
AT THE ‘BAHAI’ RELIGION
This is also a religion of the world.
The Bahais believe in Bahaullah of Iran as their prophet. This group still
exists. We call them ‘Kafir’ and they have also declared that they have nothing
to do with Islam. Well, there ends the matter.
But these qadiyani call their ‘Kufr’ as
Islam and in this way deceive Muslims. It is for this reason that they are
dualist-infidels (Zindiq) and not simply Non-Muslims. Remember! A Muslim can be
at peace with a Non-Muslim but never with a dualist-infidel (‘Zindiq’) or
apostate (‘Murtad’).
THREE
QUESTIONS TO QADIYANI
Who
has allowed you to:
1.
Call yourselves Muslims while you
believe in mirza ghulam ahmed of qadiyan as your prophet?
2.
Cancel the Kalimah of Prophet
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and adopt the Kalimah of mirza ghulam
ahmed?
3.
Call the so-called ‘Wahi’ of mirza
ghulam ahmed as the basis of salvation in place of the true ‘Wahi’ of Prophet
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)?
You impudently declare yourselves
Muslims and call us ‘Kafirs’. I quote from your mirza bashir ahmed qadiyani’s Kalimatul
Fasl, p. 110 :
“Every person who believes in Moosa but
does not believe in Isa or believes in Isa and does not believe in Muhammad or
believes in Muhammad but does not believe in the promised Masih (mirza ghulam
ahmed), (such a person) is not only an Unbeliever (“Kafir”) but a thorough
Unbeliever (“Pakka Kafir”) and an outcast from the Islamic fold”.
QADIYANI
KALIMAH
The qadiyani claim that Prophet
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was destined to come down into the world
two times, first in Makkah and this prophethood lasted 1300 years, and secondly
in Qadiyan, at the start of fourteenth Hijra in the incarnation of mirza ghulam
ahmed. Therefore in their opinion, mirza ghulam ahmed is the reincarnation of
Muhammad
I quote again mirza bashir ahmed
qadiyani from his Al Fast, p. 158:
“The promised Masih (mirza ghulam
ahmed) is Muhammad
From the above it is evident that for
the qadiyani ‘La ilaha illallah Muhammad
DO
PEOPLE KNOW THAT
The
qadiyani fabricated:
1. a different Prophet
2. a different Quran (named “Tazkirah”, which has
the same status in the eyes of qadiyani as is accorded to Torah, Zabur, Injeel
and Quran by the Muslims).
3. a different Kalimah
4. a different Shari’at
5. a different Ummat
How with all these very basic
differences the qadiyani have the cheek to tell the world that they are Muslims
and that their religion is Islam! They are Dualist-Infidels indeed. Allah
protect us from their calumny and cunning!
NONSENSE
I ask qadiyani: You call us ‘Kafirs’.
Why?
What tenets of ‘Deen’ of Prophet
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) have we refused to accept? Just because
of mirza ghulam ahmed’s birth all the Muslims of the world have become
‘Kafirs’! Before his birth, our ‘Deen’ was alright as Islam and we were
Muslims. After his creation our ‘Deen’ has become ‘Kufr’ and we have become
‘Kafirs’ !! Allah protect us from the qadiyani’ snare! Can there be any more
nonsense to compare with?
CRIMES
OF
MIRZA GHULAM AHMED OF QADIYAN
He has committed these heinous crimes:
a. Claimed Prophethood
b. Started a new religion
c. Called his followers Muslims
d. Called followers of Muhammad (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) as ‘Kafirs’.
Please tell me, if any Jew, Christian,
Hindu, Sikh, Parsee, Cobbler, Sweeper, etc., has ever committed this crime.
Therefore I say that the qadiyani are ‘Kafirs’ of the highest magnitude and of
the worst degree ever born.
CONCESSIONAL
TREATMENT
OF QADIYANI BY MUSLIMS
By Law of Shari’at, they should be
awarded capital sentence because they are Dualist-infidels ;’Zindiq’), calling
Islam ‘Kufr’ and ‘Kufr’ Islam. If they are masquerading as Muslims on the face
of the globe, it is because they have not been sentenced. Despite this
concession, they proclaim that they are being tyrannized in
Otherwise, remember! The Law of
Shari’at ordains to award them capital sentence. But the Government of Pakistan
has given them a concession. The qadiyani occupy high posts and offices in
Government administration and .public services. In spite of these concessions,
they appeal to the United Nations and to the Courts of Jews and Christians,
clamouring that the Pakistan Government has snatched their rights. What were
their rights which have been snatched? What wrong has been done to them? Only
they have been told that Kalimah Tayyiba is the Kalimah of Islam.
HOW
CAN THE QADIYANI
a) be permitted to paste bottles of liquor with
labels of Zam-Zam’?
b) be allowed to sell pig’s pork and dog’s
carrion as ‘Halal’ meat?
c) be allowed to call our Islam as ‘Kufr’?
d) be allowed to present the religion of
cockeyed mirza ghulam ahmed as Islam?
DISGRACE
The pronouncement of (arabi-127) from
the mouth of these hypocrites (i.e. the qadiyani) is
1. A disgrace of our Kalimah.
2. A disgrace of Allah’s Prophet.
3. A disgrace of Deen-e-Islam.
They cannot be allowed to go ahead with
this disgrace and deceit. Allah has said about these hypocrites:
(arabi-127)
“Allah
testifies that the hypocrites are liars”.
These dualist-infidels (‘Zindiq’) like
an apostate (‘Murtad’) must be awarded capital sentence. In the following
paragraphs I record my reasons.
COMMANDS
OF SHARI’AT FOR DESCENDANTS OF
APOSTATES (MURTADEEN’)
Shari’at allows three days’ grace
period for an apostate (Murtad) to get back into the Islamic fold. If he does
not, he is to be awarded capital punishment.
I present a case for your study.
Consider for example some apostates who forsake Islam and who happen to be in
so large numbers that, being a sizable group, they appear to be out of control
for an Islamic Government to execute them. Let me be more precise. Take the
example of an Islamic country where the Muslim population of a town decides to
become, let’s say, Christians, and having done so, manage somehow to save
themselves from the Shari’at punishment. After a passage of time these
Christians die their natural death leaving their children as Christians. The
precept for them is to force these people back into the Islamic fold, by
imprisoning them or by other appropriate means but not by capital punishment.
In other words, if the original parent was an apostate, his son will also be an
apostate. However, the grandson will not be an apostate; he will be a simple
‘Kafir’ and shall not be liable to punishment for apostasy.
COMMANDS
OF SHARI’AT FOR DESCENDANTS OF DUALIST
INFIDELS (‘ZINDIQ’)
The breed of qadiyani will never
change. They may multiply up to ninety-nine generations, still the hundredth
one will continue to be Dualist-infidel and Apostate. The reason is that their
crime is a never-ending one. So long they call their ‘Kufr’ as Islam their
infidel dualism shall see no end. This offence shall be ongoing in their
progeny.
For anybody unaware of the facts, let
it be clear to him that every qadiyani, whether he is so by conversion, or by
birth, or by heritage, is a dualist-infidel under the Shari’at Law because his
crime flows unending throughout his lineage.
TEN
LEGITIMATE SONS
AND ONE ‘NON-DESCRIPT
Something more I want to tell you for
which I shall draw an example which, I am afraid, is crude but it suits here.
A father had ten sons. All his life he
treated them as his sons. After his death a fellow gets up to claim that he is
the sole legitimate son and the ten are illegitimate. Two questions arise here:
Firstly:
Will any sane person accept the claim of this fellow who is born of a
non-descript origin and who never laid his claim while the father was alive?
Conversely, never did the deceased father say to anybody that he had a son of
that description. Can any Court of Justice in the whole world adjudicate in
favour of that fellow and declare the ten legitimate sons as illegitimate ? No.
Never!
Secondly:
What will be the reaction of the ten legitimate sons against the non-descript
who calls them sons of adultery?
Keeping the answers of the two
questions in mind, now listen: We belong to the Ummat of Prophet Muhammad
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) We
fully believe in the Deen which he brought forth. We are his spiritual
children. If I say so, it is no idea of mine but it is the holy Quran which
speaks in these terms:
(arabi-129)
‘The
Prophet is more related to Momins than their self is to them’ (Quran: Ahzab 33:6)
That is to say, no .member of the Ummat
of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has a stronger relation with
his self than what Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has with each member of his Ummat.
And the holy Quran further declares:
(arabi-130)
‘And
his wives are their mothers’. (Ibid),
It is therefore evident that all the
revered wives of the Holy (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) are our mothers and we call each of them
Ummul Momineen’ (Mother of Muslims)!; for example, Ummul Momineen Hazrat
.Aiysha Siddiqa; Ummul Momineen Hazrat Khadijat ul Kubra; Ummul Momineen Hazrat
Maimoona; Ummul Momineen Hazrat Umme Salma, ;and so on (rzu) When they are our
mothers, surely Hazrat Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is our spiritual
father.
But children in a family are seldom
identical Some are more obedient, some are less helpful, some are more
virtuous, some are less dutiful, some are more wise and some are less clever,
but they are all members of one family despite their differing personality and
varying individuality. Still they are known as children of the same parents.
Muslims have ever been the spiritual
children of Allah’s Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for thirteen centuries, till, at the
start of the fourteenth century, mirza ghulam ahmed popped up from Qadiyan and
claimed solely for himself the spiritual sonship of Allah’s Prophet Muhammad
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and excluded all others. mirza did not stop at
that, he dubbed the Muslims as “Kafirs.” The whole Ummat of Islam has been
abused by him as “illegitimate” keeping legitimacy only for himself. On this
basis mirza ghulam ahmed calls all the Muslims as “haramzadey” (bastard). Allah
protect us from his slander and abuse. Excuse me for quoting the words of mirza
ghulam ahmed but I had to.
RAVING
CLAIM
I ask the civilised courts of the world
to dismiss ghulam ahmed’s raving claim of spiritual sonship as a stupid claim
of that sinful vagrant of non-descript lineage who claims legitimacy to the
exclusion of ten real sons and who attempts to severe the connection of the
whole Ummat from their Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in spite of the Ummat’s complete
submission to his ‘Deen’ from A to Z. Have we made any alteration in the
doctrines of Islamic faith or is it ghulam ahmed qadiyani who has sinfully done
so?
DIALOGUE
WITH A QADIYANI
I happened to talk to a qadiyani once.
I told him: “We have been Muslims for thirteen centuries all along. Suddenly,
in the fourteenth century your mirza ghulam Ahmed appeared and made impossible
claims. Thus the discord ensued. Listen and be just. Here is an offer to you:
if our present beliefs are according to Islamic beliefs of the past thirteen
centuries, accept us and leave ghulam ahmed; and if your present beliefs are
according to the Islamic beliefs of the past thirteen centuries we shall accept
you. Thus the discord will come to a permanent close. Now, answer me because
pros and cons are equal for both of us.”
That qadiyani was a Punjabi of Sialkot
city. He replied in the Punjabi dialect: (Translation) “The truth is that for
us everybody is a liar except mirza sahib.”(!)
Now you must 1 have understood that the
qadiyani are a people who consider as liars the Companions (‘Sahabah (rzu) of the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) the ‘Tabeyeen’ (contemporaries of Sahabah) ‘Aimma Mujt-ahideen’
(authorities on religious matters and jurists), and ‘Mujaddideen’ (theological
reformers) and the entire Ummat spread over fourteen hundred years (arabi-132) “All liars, except mirza”!
On this premise can the qadiyani claim even an iota of relationship with Islam
and Muslims? No. Never.
CHALLENGE
TO MUSLIMS
Gentlemen, I am sure you have now
understood that mirza ghulam ahmed qadiyani, the cheat, is deceiving the entire
world by calling himself a spiritual child of the holy Prophet.( Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam)
I turn to Muslims and ask them: Don’t
you have any grace left in you to answer these shameless qadiyani? They come to
you at social level, attend your meetings in public and private and repeat
their nonsense. On your part, you are a quiet listener to the descendants of a
non-descript masquerader.
Alas, our simple Muslim brethren! Now
what are the obligations — your, mine and that of every Muslim? What does our
honour demand? It demands at least to have faith in the truth of Islamic
Shari’at’s decree on this issue, viz., capital punishment for an apostate and
dualist-infidel. But it is up to the Government to respond to the Shari’at’s
call. However, this much is within our reach that we cut off all social
connections with them and don’t let them enter our gatherings and face them
boldly everywhere.
LIAR
IN MOTHER’S LAP
Corner the liar in his mother’s lair.
He has already been led away into his mother’s haunt; praise be to Allah. The
country of
Many simple-natured Muslims of Africa,
TRAITORS
That day is not far away when the world
will get to know of the truth: that the qadiyani are not Muslims, that they are
traitors of Islam, traitors of Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and traitors of humanity.
Anti-qadiyani movement is now surging the whole world, sweeping the qadiyani
out. Final victory shall be that of our Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) and his bondsmen.
BONDSMEN
OF PROPHET
MUHAMMAD (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) IN
For some time in