Explain the contradictory claims of Mirza Qadiani concerning Muhammedy Begum’s marriage. Also prove that there is no contradiction in a Prophet’s sayings or books but Mirza’s writings are full of contradictions. Give at least three examples?

Question No.7:

               Explain the contradictory claims of Mirza Qadiani concerning Muhammedy Begum’s marriage. Also prove that there is no contradiction in a Prophet’s sayings or books but Mirza’s writings are full of contradictions. Give at least three examples?

Answer:

               Muhammedy Begum:

               Muhammedy Begum was the daughter of Mirza Qadiani’s cousin. She was not quite young. Mirza Qadiani wanted to marry her forecefully. By chance Mirza Ahmed Baig needed to get the signature of Mirza Qadiani on a deed. He asked for the signature. Mirza Qadiani seized the opportunity and said to him that he would make signature after ‘Istakharah’ (prayer for dream serving as augury). After some days Mirza Ahmed Baig asked again for the signature. At this Mirza Qadiani said that he would sign only if he gave his daughter to him (Mirza Qadiani) as a wife. He even made threats:

               “God has ‘revealed’ me that I should beg the hand of Ahmed Baig’s elder daughter. First he should make you his son in law so that he may get light from you. Say him that you (Mirza) have received the order (from God) for making the deed of gift (of land) to him, for which he is desirous. He will be given more hand and many other favours will be made with him. All this will happen if you marry your daughter with me. This is the agreement between you and me. If you agree, I will also accept. If you do not agree to it then beware because God has told me that if another man marries her, it will not be good sign for her as well as for you.”(Aina Kamalate Islam; Khazain, v.5: pp.272-273)

               The threat had a negative effect and Mirza Ahmed Baig and his family refused to give him her hand. Mirza wrote letters, published pumphelets, made predictions and even requested and supplicated, but of no avail. Muhammady Begum was married to Mirza Sultan Ahmed.

               Mirza Qadiani made many predictions about Muhammady Begum”God has foretold about my opponent relatives and as a sign, he revealed that if Ahmed Baig did not give his elder daughter to me, he would die within or even before, three years and the man who married her, would die after two and half years of marriage and ultimately that women (Muhammady Begum) would become one of his wives.”

(Ishtahar February 20, 1886; Tableeghe Risalat, v.1, p.61)

He foretells further :

                   “There is not one but six claims in this prediction, first that I shall be alive by the time of the marriage, second, the girl’s father will remain alive by the time of the marriage, third, after the marriage the father of the girl will die within three years, fourth, her husband will die within two and half years of marrige, fifth, the girl will remain alive unless I marry her, sixth, at last after becoming widow she will break all social customs and will marry me in spite of the opposition of the family”

(Aina Kamalat Islam, Roohani Khazain, v.5, p.325)

               There are a number of claims and predictions in ‘Anjam Atham’ and ‘Tazkarah’. But none of his predictions came to be true. Muhammedy Begum’s husband lived for 40 years even after Mirza’s death. He died in 1948. Muhammedy Begum died in 1966. Her life was a proof of Mirza’s lies and falsehood.

               In short, God disgraced him through his own predictions. Now this incident is sufficent to prove the wickedness and falsehood of Mirza Qadiani.

               THE STAND OF MIRZA’S FOLLOWERS

               Mirza Qadiani died in 1908 and he could not marry her. At this the Qadianies say that the marriage will took place in heaven. When it was argued that Muhammedy Begum died as a Muslim and so, as Mirza said, she would go to hell, the Qadianies said that it was Mirza’s ambigious foretelling. Perhaps the Qadianies do not know that foretelling of a Prophet is God’s promise, which is fulfilled.

CONTRADICTIONS OF MIRZA

               A prophet does not say anything from his own self. Whatever he tells or speaks, it is the will of God. That is why his saying or book is free of contradictions. If there is contradiction, it means that it is not from God, but from his own mind. In the following are some of the examples of his contradictions:

1:           “When Mirza Sahib was asked that he had made claims of Prophethood in ‘Fatehy Islam’, he replied that he did not claim of Prophethood, but of ‘Muhadeseet’.”

(Azala Awham, part one. P.221-222; Roohani Khazain, v.3, p.320)

               But on another place he writes:

               “If the man who receives the hidden news from God is not prophet, then by which name he should be called. If you say that such a man should be called ‘Muhedis’, (one who narrates traditions or the scholars of traditions) I find that the word does not stand for telling the hidden news”

(Aik Ghality Ka Azala, p.5, Roohani Khazain, v.18, p.209)

2:           “If one claims of Prophethood after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, he is a liar and infidel in my view. I believe that the ‘Revelation’ started with Adam and come to an end with Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam.

Majmoya Ashtaharat, v.1, p.230)

But in ‘Malfozat’ he gives the opinion: “We (I) claim that we are Prophet and Messenger”(Malfozat, v.10, p.127)

3:           “It is true that Christ died in his mother land, Galel. But it is not true that life came to the body after its burial.”

(Azala Oham, p.472; Khazain, v.3, p.353)

               While he writes in ‘Sat Bachen’ that”

               “And Christ left his country and as has been stated that he died in Kashmir and his grave is also in Kashmir”

(Sat Bachan, p.164; Khazain, v.10, p.307)

4:           “I just claimed of being like (Christ) and I do not claim that there will be no other ‘Maseel’ (like Christ) except me. But I am of the view that in the coming time there will be 10000 ‘Maseel’ (People who will be like Christ)

(Azala Oham, p.199; Khazain, v.3, p.1`97)

     On the other hand, he writes again that:

               “If the Quran has not called me with the name of ‘son of Mary’, I am a liar.”(Tohfatul Nadwah, p.5; Khazain, v.19, p.98)

5:           “At this no one should doubt that I have preferred myself to Christ……”

(Taryaqal Qaloob, p.157; Khazain, v.15, p.481)

And contrary to this view he writes:“God sent the promised Christ in this Ummah who is greater in his excellence than the previous Christ.”

(Haqeeqatul Wuhi, p.148; Khazain, v.18, p.233)

               Mirza Qadiani spent his energies to prove that Christ had a natural death. Neither Quran, nor Hadith, nor any geographical reference prove his view point. Inspite of it he said that Christ’s grave is in Kashmir. He writes :

               “The clear arguments prove that Christ’s grave lies in Sri Nagar, Kashmir…… He fleed from the Jew’s country and came to Afghanistan. For long time, he lived in Kohe Nouman and ultimately he came to Kashmir, where he died at the age of one hundred and twenty.

His tomb is in ‘Muhallah Khan Yar’, Sri Nagar.(Sitarae Qasaria,p.12, 13)

But at another place he writes:“The interesting thing is that also Christ’s grave is in Syria.”(Itmamal Rujatah, p.19)

               Then to support his view the copies of a letter by Molvi Muhammad Saeed Trablisy. He himself translated the letter“Christ’s grave lies in Quds” (Itamamal Hujatah, p.22)

               The contradictions in Mirza Qadiani’s account prove that whatever he says is not from God.