Courts About Qadiyaniat

          (Mr. Justice Fakhr A’lam, Chief Justice,

          (Mr. Justice Chaudhry Muhammad Siddique,

          (Mr. Justice Maulana Malik Ghulam Ali,

          (Mr. Justice Maulana Abdul Quddus Qasmi)

“In a 222 pages verdict the Federal Shar’i Court rejected an application filed by the Qadiyanies and declared that Qadiyani Ordinance is in no way contrary to Quran and Sunnah. Some Qadiyanies appealed the Federal Shar’i Court that some of the articles of Ordinance dated 1984 concerning the anti Islamic activities and speeches of the Ahmedies, the Qadiyani group, the Lahori group, should be declared as contrary to Quran and Sunnah. The court heard the application in detail.

The questions raised in the court were whether the prophet hood after Hazrat Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was continued. Whether he was the last prophet and no prophet could come after him. After hearing the explanation from Quran and Sunnah and the opinions of both the Shia and Sunny scholars, the court gave the verdict that the prophet hood has ended and the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was the last prophet.

The court also concluded that Christ would reappear as “follower” of Islamic Shari’at (law) and the Mirza Qadiyani was neither a promised Christ nor a Mehdi. In addition, the people who give false meaning to the verses of Quran are not Muslims and Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, who called himself a prophet, was infidel.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmed’s life reveal that he was wicked and cheater who gradually tried to prove himself a ‘Muhaddis’, ‘Zilly’ and ‘Brozy’ prophet and not only a prophet but also the Christ. All his foretelling and revelations proved to be false and to escape being laughed at he tried to prove through the interpretations his own writings that he had not claimed prophet hood. Mirza Ghulam Ahmed himself claimed that God hat sent revelations to him and that whoever did not accept him as a prophet after the message had reached him was infidel. Chaudhary Zaffar ullah Khan supported this claim who refused to participate in the funeral prayers of Quaid-e-Azam. The followers of Mirza Qadiyani did not allow the Muslims for ‘Azan’ in Qadiyan.

The court reached the conclusion that not allowing them using Islamic signs and terminologies did not mean interfering in their right to worship. They can do so if they do not reveal themselves as Muslims. Also they will not be allowed preach their faith and exaggerate about their faith.

The Qadiyanies will not use words like ‘Ummul Momeneen’, ‘Ameerul Momeneen’, and ‘Khalifatul Momeeen’ because these words will lead the Muslims to wrong. The same was the decision about the words used for the companions and family of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).

Muslims do feel hurt when Qadiyanies represent themselves as Muslims, act like them or use their names and titles. These things created the situation of law and order. So the court gave its verdict that the punishment and the fine that was enforced in the Ordinance of 1984 for using the Muslim specialties by the Qadiyanies was a just law.”

Justice Malik Ghulam Ali

“Qadiyaniat is an explosive mine spread under (Islam’s) walls by anti- Islam forces”.

Justice Khaleelur Rehman

“On 23 March 1989 the party of the Qadiyanies became of country years old. Government banned their hundred year’s celebrations. While rejecting a writ against this ban Justice Khaleelur Rehaman agreed with the state and people’s lawyers and wrote: “ Qadiyanies have the right not only to lead their life according to their faith but they have complete liberty like other minorities – Hindus, Sikhs, Parsees etc. But the Qadiyanies themselves have created problems for themselves by declaring themselves Muslims, by adopting ‘Kalama Tayyaba’ and the other Islamic rituals. There is the basis of Islam. If the Qadiyanies lead their lives according to the law prescribed for them and consider themselves a separate from Muslims, there will be nothing wrong in it. Their loyalty to the constitution and their status as a separate class will ensure their security and progress. How can they be allowed to pollute Muslims’ faith? If Muslims do something to safeguard their faith, the Qadiyanies should not be worried”.

Justice Gull Muhammad

“The Mirzai cannot express themselves as Muslims” or “The Mirzai cannot reveal Islam as their religion”

Mr. Ameerul Mulk Maingal (Balouchistan High court)

“After the whole discussion and arguments I have deduced that Article 298-b and 298-c of Pakistan Penal Code are two different crimes. The purpose of the article 298-b was that the names of the holy personalities, their epithets, and titles should be safeguarded from misuse. But the article 298-c declares that if any Qadiyani commits these things (of Article 298-B) he deserves punishment. When directly or indirectly any Qadiyani reveals himself as a Muslim or declares Islam as his faith or preaches his faith or provokes Muslim’s religious emotions anyway, he commits a crime.

Justice Muhammad Rafiq Tarar

“When the followers of Mirza Qadiyani use the words ‘Muhammad, the Prophet Of God ‘, they are blasphemous against Hazrat Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), the last Prophet of God”.

Justice Khaleelur Reman Ramday

“According to a design, the Qadiyanies are disobeying law by provoking Muslims’ religious emotions. According the decisions of the Higher Courts, ail of a person who commits crime repeatedly can not be accepted”.

Justice Mian Nazeer Akhtar

“To show themselves as Muslims, the Qadiyani or Lahori followers of Mirza Qadiyani cannot use the signs of Islam. The Qadiyanies a separate group and it has nothing to so with Muslim Ummah because Mirza Qadiyani openly disobeyed the Islamic teachings and falsely claimed Prophet hood and declared all those who did not have faith in his prophet hood as infidels. He went to extreme of declaring himself Adam, Moses (Alaihe Salaam), Christ (Alaihe Salaam) and even Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) (God forgive).

He dared to associate himself with the verses of the Quran revealed to Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). For the Qadiyanies the word Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in Kalama Tayyaba stands for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani. In the same manner, they invoke God’s blessings for Mirza Qadiyani. It means that when the Qadiyanies recite ‘Kalama Tayyaba ‘or invoke God’s blessings for Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam), infect they have Mirza Qadiyani in their mind and heart. And while doing so they are blasphemous against the Holy name of Hazrat Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).”

Justice Mian Mehboob Ahmad

“To safeguard the seal of Prophet Hood is the responsibility of Prophet Hood is the responsibility of Muslim Ummah. With our pen, our practice, our tears, and our love our love we are fulfilling our duty of safeguarding. The beauty and prestige of the Muslim world depend on fulfilling this duty.

Today there are numbers of mischievous that are working against the concept of the seal of the prophet hood. Now it is the time to defend it boldly. I hope that Pakistan will be in the front line to get this honor. On the Day of Judgment when the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) will ask about our role in the defense of his (Hazrat Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)   honor, the Pakistanis will offer proudly their words and blood as a gift. I pray God for your name and my name in the list of the lovers of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). This is the great blessing that we can beg from God and no doubt the God is the hearer, the wise.

(If you are loyal to Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) not to speak of this world you should be the master of your fate and destiny.)”

Justice Kiani

Mirza Nasir in a speech that he made in Rubwah disclosed that there was no greenery in Rubwah. They dug 10 feet deep pits and fill these from the soil brought from outside and succeeded in growing big and large trees. On his turn Justice Kiani referred to Mirza Nasirs’s speech and said that he appreciated Mirza Nasir’s efforts. Then Justice Kiani said in a light way:

“You deserve prays. While you are success in planting a false prophet in the hard and rocky earth of the seal of prophet hood, growing a tree in the rocky earth of Rubwah was not a little bit difficult for you.”

Justice Javed Iqbal

Referring to his father Justice Javed Iqbal says:

“For Iqbal the new revival of Zoroast (fire worshipping) of before Islam brought to movements-Behaiat and Qadiyaniat. In a sense, Behaiat showed honesty by openly separating itself from Islam. However, Qadiyaniat is still sticking to sum of Islam’s appearances and rituals while deviating from its spirit and mission. According to Iqbal (Rehmat-Ullah-Alleh) such terms as ‘Broz’, ‘Halool’ (penetration), and ‘Zill’ (shadow) were coined by the movements that deviated from the Islam in the Muslim Iran. Even the term” the promised Christ “is not the creation of Muslim conscious. In the end he says that the best way for the rulers of India is to declare the Qadiyanies a separate religious sect.”