The Mirzais distort the Ayahs and Ahadith on the execution of Prophethood. Answer the question by mentioning three of such Ayahs and Ahadith?

Question No.7:            The Mirzais distort the Ayahs and Ahadith on the execution of Prophethood. Answer the question by mentioning three of such Ayahs and Ahadith?

Answer:               On principle, it is wrong to make a debate with the Mirzais about ‘Khatm-e-Nubuwwat and because the cause of contention between the Muslims and the Qadianies is not Khatm-e-Nubuwwat. The Muslims have faith in Prophethood (Nubuwwat) and the Qadianies, too, have the faith. According to Muslims there can never be a Prophet after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. But according to Qadianies there can never be a Prophet after Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani.

This is the difference between the two. The Muslims believe Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam the last Prophet and the Qadianies belief is that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani is the last Prophet. Now Qadianies should be asked to show any one Ayah or Hadith that proves that not Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam but Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani is the last Prophet. But till doomsday no Qadiani can present any one Ayah or Hadith. Mirza says:

1-               “Only I was entitled to be called Prophet and other were not considered entitled to it.”(Haqeeqatul Wahi, p.391.Khazain, v.22, pp.406-7)

2-               Because it has been promised since the earliest times that ‘Brozi Muhammadi’ (that Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam will appear in another form), so I was bestowed with ‘Brozi’ Prophethood. Now the whole world is helpless in gaining Prophethood, because the ‘Brozi Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam was fixed for the later period. So, I appeared. Now there is no way except the mine one for the people to get beneficence of Prophethood.”

(Aik Ghalety Ka Izalah, p.11Roohani Khazain, v.18, p.215)

3-               So, we think it proper that only one Prophet is sufficient for this Ummah…… and it is our belief that there had been no Prophet in this Ummah by this time.”(Haqeeqatal Nubuwwat, p.138. By Mirza Mehmood Qadiani

4-               The people who did not accept a Holy Prophet were destroyed. Congratulations to those who recognized me. I am the last way of God’s all ways and I am the last of all His lights. Unfortunate is he who leaves me, because without one all is darkness.

(Kashti-e-Nooh, p.56Roohani Khazain, v.19, p.61)

5-

(Khatba Ilhamia, p.112Khazain, v.16, p.178)

“So God Willed to fulfil the foretelling and to make it reach the climax with the last brick. And I am the very brick.”

6-               There cannot be more than one Prophets in the Ummah of the Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. So, the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam announced the coming of just one Prophet that is the promised Christ. Except to this no one will be called a Prophet or Messenger. By saying ‘   Arabic   ‘ (There will be no Prophet after me) the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam nullified the coming of other Prophets and explained clearly that except the promised Christ (Mirza Qadiani) there would be no Prophet after him.”

(Risala Tashheed Alazhan, Qadian. March, 1914)

The end result of all these extracts is that Mirza Qadiani claims that he is the last prophet (May God forgive)

 

Qadiani distortions

Ayah No.1:            

(A’araf: 35)

“O children of Adam! Whenever there come to you Messengers from amongst you, rehearing my signs into you. These who are sighteous and mend (their lives) on them shall be no fear nor shall they grieve”

Qadianies say that the Ayah was revealed to Hazrat ,

Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, so there is reference of the prophets that will appear after him SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam the whole mankind has been addressed. It means that as long as human being exist, Prophethood will continue.

Answer 1:

Before this Ayah (No.35)  occurs three times in this ‘Rakoo’ ( Firstly ‘‘   (O’ human beings) is concerned with (). The addressee of (Arabic) is Adam Alaih-i-Salam. So in this Ayah the issue of Adam Alaih-i-Salam at the time of Adam Alaih-i-Salam has been addressed. Adam’s Alaih-i-Salam reference starts from Ayah No.10. In this perspective the addressee is Adam’s issue or children.

Answer 2:

It is crystal clear from Quranic style that Muslims are addressed as  and the people to whom the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam used to preach are addressed as  (O you people). The Holy Prophet’s SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam Ummah has never been addressed as “Urdu “(Ya Bani Addam) in the Quran.

An Explanation:    However, when “ Urdu  “ is used generally, the past commandment applies also to Holy Prophet’s Ummah, provided these have not been abolished, or there is another commandment that prohibits from acting upon the ex-commandment.

Answer No.3:

Have the Qadianies ever thought: “ Urdu “ (Human beings) includes Hindus, Christians and Jews, Sikhs, etc. can there be a Prophet among these? If not, then why they have been excluded from the generality of this Ayah. It proves that in spite of the generality of address, many things are excluded from this generality. Moreover, “ Urdu “ also includes women and eunuch, will they not be excluded? If it is argued that women and eunuch have never been Prophets previously so they can not become Prophets in future, then it will be said that formerly the Prophets were God sent, but they (Qadianies) have attached Prophethood with following of Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. So now women and eunuch can be included in the list of Prophets (May God forgive).

 

Answer No.4  If it seems to the Qadianies that in the Ayah,  there is promise of future Prophets, then what about the same that appears in . Then, it should mean that there could be new “Shariat” (Divine Law). But it is against the Qadiani faith because according to them there can not come a ‘Tashrei Nabi’ (Prophet with a new Shariat)

Answer No.5:

2-              (Ma’eda: 44)

          It is clear that the people who preached the teachings of the Torah have gone by. After the Annunciation of Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, no one, not even to the followers of the Terah, have the right to preach its teachings.

3-                 (Ana’m: 19)   “Arabic “ So, for a time period the Holy Prophet make people fear but now

4-                (Al-Ambia: 79)

‘Tasbeh’ (The glorification of God) was valid by David’s lifetime, but after it, it was stopped. But everywhere the aorist tense is used.

Answer No.6:

Answer No.7:

(Dar Mansoor, v.3, p.82)

“Aby Yasar Salma relates that God took Adam Alaih-i-Salam and all his issues in His Hand and said “” and then He looked towards the Prophets and said, “

Answer No.8:

If it is accepted that the concerned Ayah justifies the continuity of Prophethood, even then Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani can never be called a Prophet because he himself says that he is not a human being. And the Ayah is related with only human beings or the issue of Adam Alaih-i-Salam. Mirza introduces himself in these words”

“I am not made of earth, nor am I a human being. I am the hateful parts of human beings and I am worth hating.”

Ayah No.2:                  

(Nisa: 69)

“Whosoever obeys God, and the Messenger they are with those whom God has blessed, Prophets, just men, martyrs, the righteous. God companions they are”

The Qadianies say that whoever follow God and His Messenger will be Prophets, Siddiq (just men), martyrs and the righteous. They say that there is mention of four grades in the Ayah. So, when a man can be just man, martyr and righteous, why he cannot be a Prophet. To accept the three grades and to reject the one is mere distortion. If in the Ayah only company of these four is described, then will Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq (Razi Allah-o-Anho) and Hazrat Umar Farooq (Razi Allah-o-Anho) be in the company of just men and martyrs? Are they themselves not just men and martyrs?”

Answer No.1:

There is no mention of getting grades in the Ayah. The Ayah says that whoever obeys God and His Messenger, Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam will be in the company of Prophets, just men and the righteous as the last words of the Ayah, “God companions they are, reveal.

Answer NO 2:  In the world, the company of the four is not possible for everyone. So, it means the company in the hereafter. The acknowledged 10the century revivalist (Mujaded) of the Qadianies, Imam Jalaluddin, writes the context of the revelation of this Ayah in his Tafseer Jalaleen that : (Jalaleen: p.80)

“Some of the Sahaba (Razi Allah-o-Anhum Wa Razu An) (The companions of Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam) said to Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam: “You SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam will be in the highest grade of paradise and we in the lower ones. Then, how we will have the privilege of seeing you.” At this the Ayah  was revealed.” He further writes that here company means that Sahaba (Razi Allah-o-Anhum Wa Razu An) (The companions of Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam) will have the privilege of having company will Prophets, though the Prophets will be in the higher grades in paradise.”

In the same way Tafseer Kabear says:

(Tafseer Kabeer, v.10, p.170)

“There have been many explanations of the context of the revelation of the Ayah, . The first cause of the revelation is that Hazrat Thoban (Razi Allah-o-Anho), the Holy Prophet’s sane who was set free, was very fond of Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. He could not bear separation with Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. Once, with gloomy face he came to the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam on asking the cause of gloominess, he replied: “I have no problem, except it that unless I see you, I remain unnerve. And after having the privilege of seeing you I think of the Hereafter. I fear that there I’ll not be able to see you SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, because if I enter paradise” You SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam will be in the higher grades in paradise and we will be in the lower ones. And if unfortunately I am not sent to paradise, then I’ll never be able to see you.” At this the verse was revealed

It shows that here company means the company in paradise. Ibn Kaseer, Tanneer-al-Maqbas and Roohal Bian give almost the same meaning:

Hadith.

(Muntakhib Kinzul Aamal, v.4, p.7. Ibn Kaseer, v.1, p.523, Printed in Egypt)

                    “The Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam said: “A true and trustworthy merchant will be (at the day of judgment) in the company of Prophets, just men and martyrs.”

If company stands for becoming Prophet, Siddiq, etc., then the Qadianies should show that how many true and trustworthy merchants have become Prophets.

(Mishqat, v.2, p.547,Ibn Kazseer, v.1, p.522)

Hazrat Aisha Razi Allah-o-Anha relates that she heard Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam sayin“every Prophet, in his illness (that causes death) is given an option that whether he wants to live in this world or in the other world.” The illness that caused Holy Prophet’s SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam death was caught. He SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam suffered from severe cough. During the illness the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam used to say. At this I understood that the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam was being given the option of living in this world or the other world.”

It depicts that the Ayah is not concerned with becoming Prophet, because he was already a Prophet. His SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam desire was the company (of Prophets) in the other world.

MENTION OF GRANTING GRADES AND STATUS:

In the Holy Quran wherever there is mention of granting grades to the Muslims in the world, there is no mention of Prophethood :

(Al-Hadeed: 19)

1-                “And those who believe in God and His Messenger – they are the just men and the martyrs in their Lord’s sight.”

2-

(Ankboot: 9)

“And those who believe, and do righteous deeds assuredly, we shall admit them among the righteous.

3-                                         In Sura Hujrat the Muslims soldiers () have been called.

In these Ayahs there is reference of gradings of “Siddiq” (true men), just men, etc., but there is no reference of Prophethood. So, where there is reference of gradings, there is no reference of Prophethood. And whenever, there is reference of Prophethood, it is without the mention of grades in paradise, but is used in the meaning of company.

Answer No.3:

Did no one follow Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam properly during the last 1300 years? If many people followed Him SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, then why they could not become Prophets on the other hand if no one followed him SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, then His SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam “Ummah” is not good “Ummah” but evil “Ummah” (May God forgive) In Sura Tauba God Himself says about “Sahaba (Razi Allah-o-Anhum Wa Razu An) (The companions of Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam) ‘That they follow commandments of God and His Messenger SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam Properly’. Why could not they become Prophets? If the result of obedience and following is Prophethood, why great Sahaba (Razi Allah-o-Anhum Wa Razu An) (The companions of Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam) were not bestowed Prophethood. ‘Sahaba’ (Razi Allah-o-Anho) were called them  (that God is happy with them) and this is the greatest blessing of God. God says about them  (Tauba: 72) “But the greatest bless is the good pleasure of Allah.”

Answer No.4:

If for the time being, we accept that Prophethood is bestowed by following God and His Messenger SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, even then there is no mention of ‘Tashrei’ or ‘Gher Tashrei’ Prophet. Why do Qadianies mention ‘Gher Tashrei’ Prophet? If there is reference of Prophethood in the Ayah, it is concerning  (Prophets). Nabi is a Prophet without new ‘Shariat’, and Messenger is ‘Tashrei’ Prophet. So, in this way Tashrei (Prophets wish new Shariat or Divine law) should appear. But it is against the Qadiani faith. Mirza Qadiani says:

               “Concerning the Ayah ‘Arabic’, I say about my ourself that by making me enter the third grade, God blessed me with blessing. I was blessed when I was in my mother’s womb. And I was blessed not because of my efforts.”

(Haqeeqatal Wahi, p.67, Roohani Khazain, v.22, p.70)

Answer No.5: PROPHETHOOD IS INHERENT

1-               Allama Sharai (Rahmatullah Alaih) writes:

(Alewaqeet wa Al Jawaher, v.1, pp.164-165)

“That whether Prophethood is inherent or acquired? Prophethood cannot be acquired with hard work and personal effort as some foolish people regard (like Qadianies….translator). According to Malkese and others a man becomes infidel if he believes that Prophethood can be acquired.”

2-       Qazi Ayaz (Rahmatullah Alaih) writes:

(Shifa, v.2, pp.246,247)

“If a person believes in ‘acquired’ Prophethood, in the presence or after Hazrat SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, or if he claims Prophethood or even if he does not claim Prophethood but has faith in ‘acquired’ Prophethood or in that he receives revelation, all such people negate Holy Prophet’s claim that “I am the last of all the Prophets” and so are infidels”

Both the references make it crystal clear that believing in acquired ‘Prophethood has in it the elements of blasphemy against God and His Messenger SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. According to religious scholars a person having such a faith is infidel and worth killing.

Answer No.6:                 If obedience is required for gaining Prophethood, then Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is not a Prophet, because he did not follow Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam as (1) He did not offer Hajj (pilgrimage), (2) Mirza did not migrate, (3) Mirza did not wage a Holy war but called it unholy, (4) Mirza never tied stone with his belly (with hunger), (5) rape was common in India, but Mirza caused no one stone to death, (6) theft was a common thing in India but Mirza uttered no voice to cut the hands of a thief.

Answer No.7:        Moreover, company means ‘be with someone’ as           )      In this way if a man can become Prophet by having the support of Prophet then a man can become God if God is wish him (May God forgive).

Answer No.8:    This argument is based on Quran’s verse, so Mirzais should present the saying of ‘Mufeser’ or ‘Mujaded’ in the support of their argument. Without it their argument is false and concocted. Mirza writes:

“The person who is deniers of ‘Mujaded’ is one of the sinners”

(Shahadatal Quran, p.48, Khazain, v.2, p.344)

Answer No.9:    If, according to Mirzais, obedience leads to several grades – Prophethood, truemen, etc. then the question arises whether these grades are real or ‘Zilly’ or ‘Broozy’? If ‘Zilly’ or ‘Broozy’ Prophethood can be bestowed, then the grades of just men, truemen, etc. should also be ‘Zilly’ or ‘Broozy’. But they talk about ‘Zilly’ or ‘Broozy’ Prophet? They believe in ‘Tashrei’ and permanent Prophethood. So, this argument goes against themselves.

Ayah No.3:  

Qadianies says that they have no believe in “Khatm-e-Nubuwwat” (Seal of Prophethood) and they present the following Ayah in support of their view:

 (Jumma: 2.3)

“It is He Who has raised up from among the common people a Messenger from among them, to recite His signs to them and to purify them, and to teach them the Book and the Wisdom, though before that they were in manifest error,”

The Qadianies give the argument that as a Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam was raised among people, in the same way a Prophet was raised among later people in Qadian. (May God forgive)

  Answer No.1      It is written in Baizaavi that :

The Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam himself says “I have been sent just not for the ones who are present now, but for the whole humanity and for good I am a true Prophet.:

Answer No.2:     This Ayah is also a response to Hazrat Ibrahim’s (Razi Allah-o-Anho) (Abraham) prayer which he made at the completion of ‘Baitullah’ (the Holy Ka’bah):

(Baqrah: 129)

“Our Lord, do you send among them a Messenger, one of them, who shall recite to them your signs, and teach them the Book and the Wisdom and purify them.”   In the Ayah, under discussion, there is a reference to the prayer of Abraham, which resulted in the annunciation of the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam  among the illiterates. But He SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam  was a Prophet not just for the people who existed at that time but also for the people who are get to born till the Day of Judgment. Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam will remain a true Prophet, as God says  (Aaraf: 158) “O mankind, I am the Messenger of God to you all”.

So, it is clear that Mirza Qadiani and all his followers are liars to the core when they say that Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam has appeared two times.

Answer No.Answer No.5:

Answer No.6:   The ‘Mufesereen’ (before the time of Mirza Qadiani) explain the Ayah:

(Tafseer Kabeer, part-30, p.4)

(That Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam is teacher and patron of the Arabians and the non-Arabians)” Mufesereen say that it stands for the non-Arabians. Hazrat Ibne Abbas (Razi Allah-o-Anho) say that it means any people except the Arabians and ‘Maqatel’ say that it stands for ‘Tabaeen’ (Rahmat Ullah Alaihim). The result of all the saying is that ‘Ummiyeen’ (the illiterate) has been used for the Arabians and that ‘Aakhreen’ (the later) includes all the nations except the Arabs that will accept Islam till the doomsday”

(Tafseer Abu Saud, v.5, part 8, p.247)

“Aa Khreen” ( Urdu ) stands for all the people (Muslims) born after the Sahaba (Razi Allah-o-Anhum Wa Razu An) (The companions of Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam) (for all these people Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam will be the Prophet)

Answer No.7:

(Bukhari,v.2, p.727: Muslim, v.2, p.312:Tirmizi, v.2, p.232; Mishqat, p.576)

“Hazrat Abu Hurairah (Razi Allah-o-Anho) relates that some companions were sitting in the company of the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. At that time, Sura Jumma was revealed.

I asked the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam who are those (Aa Khreen) people?’ He SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam remained silent when I asked for the third time, he SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam put his hand on Hazrat Salman Farsi (Razi Allah-o-Anho) and said: ‘if Faith had been at the exalted place, there people (of Persia) would have got it……….”

SIt means that a large group from Persian will strengthen Islam, in non-Arabia and Persia there have been great ‘Muhadeseen’ (scholars of Tradition) religious scholars, ‘Mufesereen’, revivalists and saints who strengthened the cause of Islam. In fact they stand for “ arabi”. For the ones who existed at that time and for the ones who will be born, for ‘Ummiyeen’ (the Arabian) and ‘Aa Khareen’ Holy Prophet’s door is open for all. This Hadith made it clear that Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam is Prophet for all and for ever. He SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam is the Teacher and Patron for the Arabian and non-Arabian people. Now, it is clear that in this Ayah generality of Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam annunciation has been described and that there is no news about the coming of another Prophet.

Ayah No.4:    

The Qadianies present the following Ayah to prove the continuity of Prophethood:

  (2:4) “(and they believe in) what has been sent down before you (the previous Wahi)”

Answer No.1:  Here  means the Day of Judgment, as has been said in other places: “arabi” (Enkaboot: 63) “The Last Abode is real life.”   (Hajj: 11)  “For him is degradation in this world, and on the Resurrection Day”  (Al-Nahel: 41) “and the wage of the world to come is greater, did they but know.” In short, the world

occurs more than fifty times and every time it stands for ‘the coming life’ or the ‘resurrection day’ There is a tradition in Tafseer Ibne Jareer, v.1, p.106, which says that the word stands for the Day of Judgment, paradise, hell, etc. Therefore, wherever the word,  occurs in the Quran, it stands for the Resurrection day and not for the previous ‘Wahi’ (Revelation)

Answer No.2:      Mirza qadiani says” “Only that can seek salvation who has faith in what has been revealed to the last of all the Prophet Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam  ………. and the seeker of salvation is he who believes in the Resurrection day and in reward and punishment.”

(Alhuken No.34-35, v.8, 10, October 1904.Khazeena tul Irfan, v.1, p.78)

In the same way, in ‘Alhukan’ Mirza Qadiani translates  as ‘and believe in hereafter’ and then writes that ‘I believe in hereafter’

(Alhukam Number 2, v.10, 17. January 17, 1906 p.5)

     Tafseer by Hakeem Noorud Din, Khalifa Qadian. ‘And have faith in doomsday (Zamima Badraj 8, number 15, p.3. February 4, 1909)

So, according to the Mirza himself the meaning for “arabi” is not ‘the last Wahi’. It is against the translation and explanations made by the Qadiani scholars also.

Answer No.3:   The Qadianies have nothing to do with knowledge and scholarship because Mirza Qadiani himself was on ignorant man. He did not make difference between masculine and feminine gender and between singular and plural. Here is the same blender ‘Al-Akhrat’ is feminine form, while the world ‘Wahi’ is masculine, then how its adjective can be feminine. For an example, Quran can be seen  in the Ayah “Akhrat” is feminine form, so feminine pronoun form of ‘Lahya’ occurs here. For the word ‘Wahi’ masculine form should be used, so only on insane can say that ‘Al-Akhrat’ stands for ‘the last Wahi.

Ayah No.5: 

Qadiyani…(Ankabut: 27) “And we appointed the Prophecy and the Book to be among his seed” It means that God bestowed Prophethood and the Book in Abraham’s Alaih-i-Salam generation. The Qadianies say that as long as there is Abraham’s Alaih-i-Salam generation, the process of Prophethood will continue.

Answer No.1:     If the Ayah shows that ‘Nubuwwat’ (Prophethood) is continued, then the revelation of the Book should be continued, but it is against the Qadiani faith. The argument that negates the continuity of the revelation of the Book also negates the continuity of Prophethood.

Answer No.2:     The subject for ‘arabi’ is God. It means that Prophethood is inherent. However, the Qadianies believe that Prophethood can be acquired by obeying the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi WA Aalihi Wasallam. Therefore, Qadiani faith has contradictions within itself.

Reply to Qadiani objections at Ahadit

………. About this Hadith the Qadianies argue that if Holy Prophet’s son, Hazrat Ibrahim, were alive, he would have been a Prophet. Because of death, he could not become Prophet; otherwise, there was chance that he would become Prophet.

Answer No.1:    The Hadith to which the Qadianies present to strengthen their argument occurs in Ibn Ma’aja. The wordings of the Hadith are

(Ibn Ma’aja, p.108) “Hazrat Ibn Abbas (Razi Allah-o-Anho) relates that when the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam  son, Ibrahim, died, the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam  said the funeral prayer and said that duty has been assigned to the ones who will make him feed in paradise. And if he had remained alive, he would have been a Prophet and if he had remained alive, (I) would have set his ‘Qabty’ uncles free and no ‘Qabty’ would have been a prisoner”

1                 In Arjah Alhaja Ali Ibn Ma’aja, Shah Abdul Ghani Mujaddedi (Rahmatullah Alaih) has challenged the authenticity of this tradition:

(Anjah, p.108)

“Some (Muhadeseen) have challenged the authenticity of this Hadith as Syed Jamaluddin Muhadith mentions it in Rozae Ahbab”

2-

(Mouzuat Kabeer, p.58)

“In Tehzeebalasma wallughat Imam Navavi (Rahmatullah Alaih) says that the Hadith is false. To be too bold about hidden matters is not Proper thing.”

3-           Sheikh Abdul Haq Dehlvi (Rahmatullah Alaih) writes that the chain of the narrators of this Hadith is not reliable Abu Sheebah Ibrahim bin Usman falls among the narrators. So, it is not authentic and is a poor Hadith.

4-           The opinion of the Muhadeseen about Abu Sheebah Ibrahim is that he is not reliable. This is the opinion of Hazrat Imam Ahmad bin Hambal (Rahmatullah Alaih), Hazrat Imam Yahya (Rahmatullah Alaih) and Hazrat Imam Dawood (Rahmatullah Alaih). Hazrat Imam Tirmizi says that he is denier of Hadith. Hazrat Imam Nissai (Rahmatullah Alaih) says that he narrates obsolete Ahadith.Hazrat Imam Joz Jani (Rahmatullah Alaih) says that he is not reliable.Hazrat Imam Abu Hatim (Rahmatullah Alaih) says that he narrates ‘Zaeef’ (poor) Hadith.

               Therefore, it has been advised that the Hadith that he narrates should not be written. He narrates the ‘Munkir’ Ahadith from ‘Hukem’. The Qadianies want to prove their false faith with the help of this poor tradition. They should be aware of the fact that a single tradition (though authentic) is not sufficient to prove a faith. Therefore, there is no chance for a poor tradition to prove a faith.

Answer No.2:             The interesting thing is that before the said tradition Ibn Ma’aja has copied on authentic tradition narrated by Hazrat Ibn Aofi (Rahmatullah Alaih). Imam Bukhari (Rahmatullah Alaih) has also copied this tradition in his Sahey Bukhari. The tradition roots out the Qadiani claim of the continuity of Prophethood.

               Would that the Qadianies read this tradition also which says:

“Ismael, the narrator, says that he asked Hazrat Abdullah Ibn Aofi (Rahmatullah Alaih) that whether he had seen the Holy Prophet’s SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam son, Ibrahim. Abdullah Ibn Aofi (Rahmatullah Alaih) replied that Ibrahim died in his childhood and if there had been any Prophet after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, Hazrat Ibrahim would have remained alive. But there is no Prophet after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam”

               This is the tradition, which Ibne Ma’aja writes in the beginning of this chapter. Hazrat Imam Bukhari (Rahmatullah Alaih) has also copied the full text of the tradition in the chapter “” in Sahey Bukhari (V.2, P914)

               Mirza Qadiani himself accepted that ‘after the Holy Quran, Sahey Bukhari is the most authentic book’. (Shadatal Quran, p.40; Roohani Khazain, v.6, p.337). If the Mirzais had been honest, they would not have preferred a poor tradition to a tradition in Sahey Bukhari but the Mirzais and honesty are two contradictory things.

               Here is another tradition:

(Masnad Ahmed, v.4, p.353)

“Ibn Aby Khalid says that he heard Ibn Aby Aofi (Rahmatullah Alaih) saying that if there had been any Prophet after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam, his SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam son, Ibrahim, would not have died.”

               Saddi (Rahmatullah Alaih) asked Hazrat Ans (Razi Allah-o-Anho) the age at which Hazrat Ibrahim died. He replied  His reply was that he filled the cradle, i.e., he died in his childhood. If he had not died, he would have been as Prophet. He died because your Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam is the last Prophet. (Talkhees Al Tareek al Kabeer Labin Asakir, v.1, p.494: Fathel Bari, p.477, v.10)

               It is mean and dishonesty to prefer a ‘Zaeef’ (poor) Hadith to a Hadith in Sahey Bukhari, Masnad Ahmad, and Ibn Ma’aja. Moreover, the Hadith is contrary to Quranic teachings and hundreds of Ahadith. Only those people have the courage to present the Hadith about whom Quran says, “God has set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes if as covering.”

2         

The Qadianies say that Hazrat Aisha Razi Allah-o-Anha has said that

(Taknalah Majma-al-Hajarg 5, p.502, Dur Mansoor v.5, p.204)

Answer No.1:

               It is not proper to relate this saying to Hazrat Aisha Razi Allah-o-Anha. There is no authenticity of it in any book. It is falsehood to argue against the clear verses of the Holy Quran and the continuous ‘Ahadith’ with the help of disjointed saying.

Answer No.2:

               The Holy Prophet says, “I am the last Prophet and there is no Prophet after me.” In addition, this saying,  of Hazrat Aisha Razi Allah-o-Anha is in contradiction to that of Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. When there is a contradiction between the saying of Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam and that of any of the Sahaba (Razi Allah-o-Anhum Wa Razu An), then the saying of the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam is preferred. Moreover, the Hadith, ‘there is no Prophet after me,’ has many authentic continuous narrators and Hazrat Aisha’s Razi Allah-o-Anha saying is a disjointed saying. How can it be preferred to a ‘Sahey Hadith’?

Answer No.3:

               There is another Tradition by Hazrat Aisha Razi Allah-o-Anha in Kinzul Aamal, which says “

(Kinzal Aamal, v.15, p.371, Hadith No.41423)

               Now there is no justification to relate the Hadith, under discussion, the Hazrat Aisha Razi Allah-o-Anha.

Answer No.4:            The falsehood of the Qadianies is very clear because they copy the saying incomplete. The complete version is  (Taknalah Majmal-Hajjar, p.502, v.5)

               Such sayings that of Mugherah’s (Razi Allah-o-Anho) that says “The purpose behind all such sayings is that Christ will appear. They say that it should not be said that there will be no prophet after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam because Christ will appear on the other hand, it should be said that Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam made an end of Prophethood because no one will be bestowed with Prophethood, Christ was bestowed with Prophethood before Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam

Answer No.5:    In this saying  occurs in ‘      ‘. Therefore, its first meaning will be that “no one will be bestowed with Prophethood after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. In Marqat Hashia Misqat the same meaning has been deduced, which are correct.

               Second meaning:, that no Prophet will appear after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. It is wrong because Christ will appear Hazrat Mugherah (Razi Allah-o-Anho) has prohibited from deducing such a meanings and it is also in keeping with our faith.

               Third meaning”, that no Prophet is alive after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. Keeping this meaning in mind Hazrat Aisha (Razi Allah-o-Anha) narrated that . It is right because she has also narrated the tradition concerning Christ’s appearance.

A question by Qadiyanie.                Qadiyanies say that if this saying of Hazrat Aisha Razi Allah-o-Anha has no authenticity, Taleeqat Bukhari has also no authenticity?

Answer:               It is falsehood. The author of Fathal Bari, Allama Ibn Hijer (Rahmatullah Alaih), has compiled a book, called ‘Taleeq Altaleeq.” And it also includes Taleeqat Sahey Bukhari.

3-

Qadianies say that Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam has said “arabi”, “My mosque is the last mosque.” Mosques are being constructed daily after Holy Prophet’s mosque. In the same way there can be new Prophets.

Ans:       In the Hadith where there are the words. , there are also the words . It is the Sunnah of all prophets that they built God’s House (mosque). Masjid-e-Nabvi is the last of all the mosques made by Prophets. It is argument in favour of seal of Prophethood. It does not prove the continuity of Prophethood.

4-            

Qadianies say that the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam said to his uncle, Hazrat Abbas (Razi Allah-o-Anho):

(Kinzul A’amal, v.12, p.699. Hadith No.33387) If migration is continued after the migration of Hazrat Abbas (Razi Allah-o-Anho) Prophethood will also continue after Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam.

Answer:                The Qadianies have distorted this Hadith also. The real matter was that Hazrat Abbas (Razi Allah-o-Anho) after leaving (Migration) Mecca  had left for Medina. When he had covered a distance of some miles, he came across the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam with an army of ten thousand ‘Qudse’, who had left Medina for Mecca to conquer it. Seeing this Hazrat Abbas was sorry that he could not get the honour of migration. At this occasion the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam said the words of the concerning Hadith. Hazrat Abbas (Razi Allah-o-Anho) was really the last migrant from Mecca. Holy migration is always from a place to infidelity towards a place of peace. Mecca was conquered by the Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam and it would remain a place of peace and security till Dooms day. So, Hazrat Abbas (Razi Allah-o-Anho) is really the last migrant. That is why the Holy Prophet said “O uncle! You are the last of the migrants. After you whoever leaves Mecca, will not get the title of a Migrant (Muhajir)

Hafiz Ibn Hijer writes. (Asabah, v.2, p.271 printed in Bairat) “Hazrat Abbas (Razi Allah-o-Anho) migrated before the conquest of Mecca and he was present at the occasion of the conquest.”

5-            

The Qadianies say that the following Tradition proves the continuity of Prophethood:

“Abu Bakr is superior to all people, except that there appears a Prophet”                               (Kinzul A’amal, v.11, p.435. Hadith No.32547)

Answer:           After this tradition, it is written that.  “This tradition is one of the traditions which have been denied.” Such traditions cannot be used to prove faith.

Answer No.2:        Hazrat Ans Bin Malik (Razi Allah-o-Anho) says:

(Kinzul A’amal, v.11, p.546 Hadith No.32564)

 “Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq (Razi Allah-o-Anho) is superior to all the other Sahaba (Razi Allah-o-Anhum Wa Razu An) (The companions of Holy Prophet SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam) of all the Prophets including that of Hazrat Muhammad SallAllah-o-Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam”

There is another tradition by Hazrat Abu Hurairah (Razi Allah-o-Anho)

(Kinzul A’amal, v.11, p.560. Hadith No.32645)

“Except to Prophets and Apostles, Abu Bakr (Razi Allah-o-Anho) and Umar (Razi Allah-o-Anho) are better than anyone, whether they appeared in the beginning or in the end, in heaven and earth.”